MMARAU Institutional Repository

Empiric deworming to delay HIV disease progression in adults with HIV who are ineligible for initiation of antiretroviral treatment (the HEAT study): a multi-site, randomised trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dr Judd Walson, MD
dc.contributor.author Benson Singa
dc.contributor.author Laura Sangaré
dc.contributor.author Jaqueline Naulikha
dc.contributor.author Benjamin Piper
dc.contributor.author Prof Barbra Richardson
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-31T08:18:37Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-31T08:18:37Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7462
dc.description.abstract Background Co-infection with HIV and helminths is common in sub-Saharan Africa and findings from previous studies have suggested that anthelmintic treatment might delay immunosuppression in people with HIV. We aimed to assess the efficacy of empiric deworming of adults with HIV in delaying HIV disease progression. Methods In this non-blinded randomised trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV who did not meet criteria for the initiation of antiretroviral treatment from three sites in Kenya. Using a computer-generated sequence, we randomly assigned (1:1) eligible participants to either empiric albendazole every 3 months plus praziquantel annually (treatment group) or to standard care (control group). Participants were followed up for 24 months. We measured CD4 cell counts every 6 months and plasma HIV RNA annually. The primary endpoints were a CD4 count of less than 350 cells per μL and a composite endpoint consisting of the first occurrence of a CD4 count of less than 350 cells per μL, first reported use of antiretroviral treatment, and non-traumatic deaths. We compared these measures by use of Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT00507221. Findings Between Feb 6, 2008, and June 21, 2011, we enrolled and followed-up 948 participants; 469 were allocated to the treatment group and 479 to the control group. All participants were provided with co-trimoxazole prophylaxis. Median baseline CD4 cell counts and HIV RNA concentrations did not differ between groups. We recorded no statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups in the number of people reaching a CD4 count of fewer than 350 cells per μL (41•6 events per 100 person-years vs 46•2 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio 0•89, 95% CI 0•75–1•06, p=0•2) or the composite endpoint (44•0 events per 100 person-years vs 49•8 events per 100 person-years; 0•88, 0•74–1•04, p=0•1). Serious adverse events, none of which thought to be treatment-related, occurred at a similar frequency in both groups. Interpretation Our findings do not suggest an effect of empiric deworming in the delaying of HIV disease progression in adults with HIV in an area where helminth infection is common. Alternative approaches are needed to delay HIV disease progression in areas where co-infections are common. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Empiric deworming to delay HIV disease progression in adults with HIV who are ineligible for initiation of antiretroviral treatment (the HEAT study): a multi-site, randomised trial en_US
dc.type Learning Object en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account