Abstract:
The main challenge with respect to water in the rural setting, lies in
access, control and management. Collective action has been taken up following the
International Water Management (IWM) principles and institutionalized in the
Kenyan legal framework through water resource users’ associations (WRUAs). We
carried out this study to assess whether this collective action has any impact on
household poverty using objective poverty measures (consumption and income),
a subjective poverty measure and a water poverty measure. We used 2019 household survey data of 652 randomly selected rural households from the Upper Ewaso
Ng’iro North Catchment Area. We employed the full information maximum likelihood endogenous probit regression model to obtain the impact of WRUA membership on household poverty status. We find that collective water management
can have welfare improving impacts for rural households, especially where there
low public investments in water provision, management and access. We recommend that WRUAs be empowered through financial, legal and capacity building
interventions to enhance their community impacts.Subjects: Agriculture & Environmental Sciences; Environment & Resources; Sustainable
Development; Rural Development; Economics; Environmental Economics
Keywords: Objective poverty; subjective poverty; water poverty; collective action; rural
poverty; Upper Ewaso Ng’iro North Catchment
