Abstract:
Cases of indiscipline have persisted in secondary schools in Kenya. They involve 
disruptive behaviour that takes the form of strikes, bullying, violence, drug abuse, 
burning schools, school dropout rates and teenage pregnancies. These issues are on 
the rise and have adversely affected learning outcomes in education across many high 
schools in Meru County. This study sought to assess the influence of student councils’ 
involvement in governance on discipline in secondary schools in Meru County, 
Kenya. The objectives which guided the study were to assess the influence of student 
councils’ involvement in policy formulation, subject selection, mentorship 
programmes, teacher supervision and infrastructural management on students’ 
discipline in public secondary schools. The study was guided by Social Contract 
Theory and adopted descriptive survey research design. The target population 
included deputy principals, Heads of Departments, Guidance and Counselling, and 
presidents of student councils drawn from 326 secondary schools of Meru County, 
totalling 978. Stratified sampling was done based on the number of sub counties 
(nine) in Meru County and selection of four schools from every sub county was done 
through random sampling. A sample of 36 public secondary schools was selected. 
Hence, the study sample was 36 deputy principals, 36 heads of guidance and 
counselling department and 36 presidents of student councils. Data from heads of 
guidance and counselling department and presidents of student councils was done 
using Questionnaires and interviews schedules used for deputy principals. Piloting 
was done in four secondary schools from Embu County. The researcher liaised with 
subject matter experts from the University and triangulating the pilot study findings to 
establish validity of the research instrument. Reliability of the instruments was 
established via test-retest technique where a reliability index, R≥0.7, was assented. 
Qualitative data was analysed thematically along the objectives and presented in 
narrative form. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics and 
inferentially using logistic regression. After coding, cross – case analysis was 
conducted. The quantitative data was presented in tables and charts. The study 
established that the level of students’ discipline was at 60% with a few cases (30%) of 
students’ indiscipline. While student councils were a feature in all secondary schools, 
they were not engaged equally across board. The research established that full 
involvement of student councils in all aspects of school governance including policy 
formulation, subject selection, mentorship programmes, teacher supervision and 
infrastructural management resulted in reduced cases of indiscipline amongst the 
students. Schools with less engagement of the student council had higher cases of 
student indiscipline. The study thus recommends that the school administration 
improve their engagement of school councils in school governance; provide capacity 
building for the student council members, and develop training programs to build 
their leadership skills. The Ministry of Education should develop a policy to guide on 
the involvement of student councils in all aspects school governance.