| dc.description.abstract |
Discourse on gendered language continues to elicit debate since it communicates
prejudiced opinions and views about males and females. The course books of English for
Kenyan secondary schools contain gendered language that portrays stereotyped
perspectives about females and males. However, literature on gendered remarks which
exclude, trivialize and demean either gender in those books has not been documented.
This study examined gendered language in Secondary English for Form1-3 and New
Horizons in English for Form 4 course books approved by KICD. The study explored the
forms of gendered language, analysed ideologies that determine use of gender biased
language and explained how power is manifested in gendered language since there is
scanty knowledge about the gendered language in the current course books for English.
The study employed a conceptual framework constituting Fairclough‘s (2001) Critical
Discourse Analysis approach and Lakoff‘s (1975) Deficit Approach to explain ideologies
that determine gendered language and power relations manifested in the English course
books. An analytical research design was adopted in studying pictures and texts such as
passages, dialogues, narratives, interviews, speeches, letters, biographies and poems with
gendered language. 15 texts with gendered overtones from each course book were
identified by purposive sampling to make a total of 60 texts and 22 accompanying
pictures. The researcher read the texts and identified gender unresponsive pictures,
words, sentences and dialogues and then a list of the data was prepared for analysis.
Content analysis was used to classify data into gendered language at word, sentence and
discourse level. The analysis of the data for this research was based on the three
dimensional model, Critical Discourse Analysis by Fairclough (2001). The findings of
this study indicate existence of gendered language at word, sentence and discourse levels
since males are over-represented as compared to females. The males are over-
represented in pictures and texts in number and portrayal in determining roles in society
whereas females are over-represented in nurturance and supportive roles. The male
gender is portrayed as the norm and powerful, controlling resources and females. On the
other hand, females are excluded and undermined through use of gender unresponsive
language. The ideologies informing gender biased language represent males and females
as existing in separate spheres of society in binary opposition relation. The forms of
power relations between genders legitimize males over females as expressed by gendered
language. Findings indicate that the English course books of Kenyan secondary schools
promote patriarchy through gendered language. |
en_US |